Authorized remote penetration testing

Find the breach
before they do.

Manual web application penetration testing for small SaaS teams and digital agencies that need clear answers—not noisy scanner output.

Written authorizationFixed scopeRetest included
Assessment overview● In review

Attack surface

Customer Portal

72/100

Authentication bypass

Validated finding
Critical

Broken access control

Validated finding
High

Session weakness

Validated finding
Medium
31Tests run
7Findings
1Retest
DeliverableRemediation-ready report

The core service

One focused test.
Clear next steps.

Built for teams preparing for a customer security review, a launch, or their next stage of growth.

WEB APPLICATION PENTEST

A complete, fixed-scope engagement

Authenticated and unauthenticated testing
OWASP-aligned manual methodology
Access control and business logic testing
Risk-ranked findings with evidence
Executive and technical summaries
One remediation retest included
Every engagement starts with permission. Testing begins only after the exact targets, dates, techniques, exclusions, and emergency contacts are documented in writing.

What we examine

Testing that follows how
your application actually works.

Automated tools support discovery, but they do not replace manual analysis. The engagement focuses on realistic attack paths and validates findings before they reach your report.

Authentication & sessions

Login, password reset, account recovery, MFA flows, session expiration, token handling, and protections against account takeover.

Authorization & business logic

Role boundaries, tenant isolation, object-level access, workflow abuse, privilege escalation, and bypasses of intended business rules.

Application attack surface

Inputs, APIs, file handling, browser controls, injection risks, server-side requests, and exposure of sensitive functionality.

Data exposure

Sensitive information in responses, errors, URLs, client-side code, exports, and access paths that could reveal another customer’s data.

What you receive

Evidence your developers
can act on.

The goal is not merely to identify weaknesses. It is to help your team understand the risk, reproduce it safely, and verify that the fix works.

Detailed technical report

Risk-ranked findings with evidence, affected components, reproduction steps, business impact, and specific remediation guidance.

Results meeting

A live walkthrough for technical and business stakeholders, with time to discuss priorities and ask questions.

One verification retest

After fixes are deployed, priority findings are tested again and their status is documented in an updated report.

Clear boundaries prevent surprises

Source-code review, cloud configuration review, mobile applications, internal networks, social engineering, denial-of-service testing, and ongoing monitoring are not included unless specifically added to the written scope. Destructive testing and access to real customer data are avoided.

How it works

From scope to
verified fix.

A controlled process designed to fit into a working development team without surprises.

01

Scope

We confirm targets, test windows, exclusions, and written authorization before testing begins.

02

Test

Manual testing and careful validation uncover exploitable issues automated scans miss.

03

Report

You receive evidence, business impact, and clear remediation guidance—not a scanner dump.

04

Retest

After your fixes, one included retest verifies that priority findings are resolved.

“Security findings only matter when your team can understand them, prioritize them, and fix them.”

Why Shield

Technical depth.
Human communication.

Shield Cybersecurity is an independent remote testing practice built to give growing teams direct access to their tester. You’ll know what was tested, what is actually exploitable, and what to do next.

Direct accessSpeak with the person performing your test.
No fear tacticsMeasured risk, evidence, and practical guidance.

Ready when you are

Let’s put your application
to the test.

Tell us what you’re building and why you need it tested. We’ll reply with the questions needed to define a safe, useful scope.

Start a conversation